David Blunkett should have resigned as soon as he was found out cheating with
someone else's wife, giving out free train tickets and sorting out passports so the middle
class can turn the UK in a land of multiculturalism were every middle class family has a
house slave. New labour has tried to come across as the clean alternative to the Tories,
yet the image is as false as the Tories image was.
He wore his wedding ring so as not to seem 'availiable'
Davids own 20-year marriage ended in divorce in 1990. Reasons for the
split are unclear, but most rich men and politicians seem to find a need to trade
the old in for new as they go through a mid life crisis. Back in 2001 Blunkett
told the Daily Telegraph that he continued to wear his wedding ring, in spite
of being a divorcee, because he claimed it was "a useful way of ensuring that
people don't casually think I am available". Why does he have to pretend he was
being faithful when he was divorced? No-one is denying the Home Secretary
the right to 'get it on', but he has to understand that married women are
a no no. We can understand it if Blunkett has drank one over the 8 and
accidentally slept with a married women, but this is no accident. He
may well have been sober as judge.
Blunkett hasn't just slept with another mans wife, he obviously had
to act in a deceitful manner and sly manner to actually make it happen. He knew she was
married, but did he care?
Multiculturalism = Slave labour for the middle class
As a favour to the married women he is having an affair with, Blunkett fast
tracks the passport application of a nanny from the Philippines for his fancy women,
and now new labour might well have to allow thousands more nannies a permanent
residency passport due to Davids uncanny ability to find a way to get a passport
processed in record breaking time. The middle class are using third world slave
labour and this lazy foreign American cannot apparently spare the time and energy
to look after her own child. Even with two fathers, she needs a nanny! The middle
classes call this import of cheap labour 'multiculturalism'.
A Ticket to Ride
Let us remember that Blunkett gave a taxpayers funded train ticket to
this married women. He has paid it back, but he has to do that - now we all know
what he has done. He has used his privileged position to throw a freebie to impress
a woman despite being both being on massive salaries and freebies. His fancy women
is a rich women and did not need a free ticket. Still, that's the rich for you -
they'll grab anything free off the poor beleaguered taxpayers. Like the Beatles
song goes, "she's got a ticket to ride, and she don't care!"
Peeping Tom Blunkett
David Blunkett wants his own private life to remain private - yet he wants
to set up national ID schemes and snoop on the entire nation. A working class women making
a claim down the local benefit agency might will be asked who she sleeps with. CCTV cameras
in Kirkby can snoop into peoples houses and may well soon scan every car number plate (they
do in Liverpool) with the option of incorporating facial recognition technology. Blunkett
knows that all our internet records and emails are snooped on. Blunkett himself is a bit
of a peeping Tom yet wants to close his own net curtains whilst looking through ours with
a high powered telescope.
Now we see David demands rights to see
'his' child. As a man I have great
sympathy in some respects with any man who wants to actually be a decent father
and finds the dammed law will not allow him to - but new labour are making life
very difficult for most decent fathers, they've resorted to hanging off cranes
in batman outfits just to get equal rights, so sympathy for Blunkett is in short
supply. As far as we know, when a man asks for visiting rights we first need to
have DNA tests. Its no use saying
'it looks like me'. Even then, as many men
in Kirkby will tell you, visiting rights are almost entirely dependent on the
women. If she has it in mind to make things difficult for you, then the nearest
you might get to your child is a photo in your wallet. If you get a married
women pregnant, things are even more difficult when popping round to see how
things are going. That dinner party conversation could become
'awkward' as
a husband has to endure the company of some sleazebag politician who has slept with his
wife. If the home secretary breaks your sacred wedding vows, are you going to
be drinking/golfing buddies with him?
Power
Think about this also ladies and Gentlemen of the Jury - Davids only landed this
'fancy women' because of the fact he is an MP. In other words, he is using
his position of power to attain that which would otherwise be beyond his reach. Let
us for a moment imagine that David was not an MP or the Home Secretary. Let us imagine
he was instead some unknown history teacher, or perhaps a piano tuner. Let us imagine
that he met the editor of Forbes magazine for snobs at a local college Christmas party.
Would she have made her move for a lowly history teacher or piano tuner? Does David really
think he'd be having affairs with women like this if he did not have power?
As expected, Tony Blair is standing by his man and sees no wrong,
despite the Bible having a pretty clear view on the matter of sleeping with
another mans wife.
Blair who consistently tried to come across as a pious middle class
Holy Man from the suburbs, is actually leading us to wonder what sexual
scandals he might have been involved in. There are various allegations
about many new labour MP's on the WWW. I'll leave your imagination and
Google search engine to see what might be alleged, I'm not saying anything
is true one way or the other, yet. John Major,
we might recall, used the
Mr Pious and Mr Monogamous image to great effect when in power. Yet whilst
he was sneering at single working class mums for not being married, he
was romping with Edwina Curry whilst married.
Do as we say not as we do, seems to be the Golden Rule of British politics.
