

Tony Blair, Father of 4, Killer of many more.
|
The CIA and the UK's role in the War on Iraq
The CIA recently admit that they did not consult wide enough to account for the varied
opinions knowledge and facts that could have contributed to the NONE INVASION of
Iraq. The declaration of war on Saddam Hussein was illegal.

Without the WMD and the Toxic threat delivered by Rockets, is Hussein now
not guilty and does not the Security Council have a duty to bring, Blair Straw
Bush Powell before the council for at least an explanation?
Today we are faced with the knowledge, undisputed irrevocable knowledge that our
Prime Minister told lies when he backed Bush in saying that "We have evidence
that Hussein has the weapons and intends to use them".
Today those lies those damned lies that murdered innocent children are for us
"To put behind us"
Just in case there are those who questions our involvement in these murders
let us be guided by Mr. Sands Head of Cherie Blair's Chambers to boot!
In an Interview on the World BBC, he said "The Global rules of Law state that
war is permissible.........
1) If threatened by another state.
2) By the Authority of the Security Council
3) Where Human Rights are at stake
Sands went on to explain.........
The final interpretation in this country, the Legal arbiter is the Attorney General.
His advice is given to the Prime Minister as to the legality of going to war.
Here is a brief insight into the advice received on the 7th March. "It is safer
to go for a second resolution from the Security Council for the authority to use force".
7th March a letter from the International Oxford/Cambridge Lawyers
"It is transparently obvious that this act of aggression is illegal"
We all remember France Non German Verboten Russia Niet. There was no second resolution.
By the 17th March "It is legal to go to war"

This sparked the resignation of the Foreign Office Department. Robin Cook and many
others they wait for us to invite them back.
The accusation that BLAIR and Bush had planned this act of war some twelve
months before is now apparent.
The refusal to allow the weapons inspectors to continue and to force them to
return months before the final inspections would have stated that NO WMD existed.
The series of Security Council Resolutions over twelve months on which win the vote
and to force through the indicative Resolution 1441. This resolution was deemed not
be sufficient for war by many but not Bush and Blair
The CIA now admitted to a lack of a range of views in other words "Do not give
us any facts our intention and self - evident it is war we want"
The fatal end of Kelly

The unaccountable turn around of Rice and Powell "There is now evidence of WMD" to a volte
face "Now we see them" formed these cocked up aerial photos
submitted as evidence to "That" now infamous security debate.
He ended by insisting that Cherie Blair is fully cognisant of his
(Sands) opinion of the illegality of her husbands' actions.
Recap for "WAR".
NO THREAT FROM ANOTHER STATE
NO AUTHORITY FROM THE SECURITY COUNCIL
NO HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUE
No justification - No Rule of Law- No legal grounds- BUT OIL OIL OIL OIL.
If International Law is inadequate then add to it do not detract the virtues
in an undue haste for self-aggrandisement.
Churchill and Roosevelt saw in 1944 -5 that there was a need to International
Law to ensure a Dignity of Independence. International Law is not perfect but
it is independent of the Myopic National/International collusion for power
contrived by Bush and Blair.
International Rules exist in Markets Health and Safety Property so why not
Security Dignity and Independence and the State.
The Geneva Conference set down agreed rules on Torture Interrogation Prisoners
Rights. These are the marks of a civil association. That these and rules of
Habeas Corpus exist and are observed is a precondition of a State.
John Bolton of "us alone" believes (NYT)
"International Law is a threat to the United States and is not binding"
Col. Sanchez the Col. In Iraq ISSUED A MEMO as Chief that to torture is OK (NYT)...
What is G.B. and the Us alone stance on the Geneva Convention?
"The 9/11 was a criminal act and not a act of a state!! Hussein was therefore a
criminal and harboured Al Queda and was in collusion".
This led to an independent need not to have the Security Councils'
Authority and therefore a Pre-emptive "Stealth Bomber Attack" was justified.
The UN deemed out of date 40 yrs. old, and did not have the ability to act
against "Criminal Iraq" and the therefore guilty. The total
indigenous people all branded as criminals.
The Iraq Criminal situation was not covered therefore no treaty existed. Go it alone for
Freedom
If we consent to International Rules we will abide by them. If we do not
consent then we will not abide by them Go it alone.
We have the greatest power on Earth so Go it alone.
The decision to consent or not to consent is made by the Politicians the Neo
- Cons the White Supremacist and the Churches and "Their" baseless faith. This
group are not trained in Law they do not know the binding nature of independent
issues resolved in rules of law.
Here it is paramount to know that Blair and Straw are and were disgraced because
they are, of the Law, they are trained professionals and gave up the will to
protect the law and now will face the silent might of the mass.
Bush Blair and Straw have self - interest (whatever that is) and not the greater
good, that of International Statesmanship.
Why did BUSH Blair Straw and the ARCHBISHOPS CARDINALS and the Sycophantic
Churches do this?
Why did they invade Iraq illegally? Why entreat the Image of Bush what was the gain?
How can the act of war be legal when there are no WMD; No toxic warheads
(only Blair Bush 's heads)
This Country G.B. is lead by two men trained in the Law and in
International Treaties they understand the bond of trust that binds
us together the "Rule of Law" and if law can be "Just" then a just war by definition.
NONE of this existed when they declared war on Iraq.
They failed to honestly truly represent the wishes of the silent mass. They
acted in collusion to commit acts of war crimes and will be charged in the
process of time. Pinochet - Touché.
The inference that 9/11 was different and expedient threatening dangerous to life
and limb in far off foreign fields is fallacious and is now pronounced as ill founded
and without due regard to differing information.
The decision to send so aptly named STEALTH BOMBERS to blast to smithereens the
children of the desert is declared fraudulent. Premeditated over a period of
some 12 months
We by association are guilty too of at the very least, manslaughter and war
crimes by being complicit in the civil association. We are guilty of aiding and
abetting and perverting the course of justice by not handing over Blair and Straw
to the courts as Pinochet on the very same charges. If they were valid against
Pinochet then so too Blair and Straw.
If we allow them to stand for Parliament and do nothing to dissuade the voters in
their constituency of their willingness to entrap us in war then we are guilty of
complicity.
They entrapped us, the silent majority, they deliberately withheld the necessary and
sufficient evidence to listen to dissenting opinions (now deemed valid) including
the valiant Weapons Inspectors, Dissenting and Resigning Politicians and High Ranking
Secret Service Officials and most compelling the Oxbridge International Lawyers.
The minimum Bush and Blair are guilty off is refusing informed opinion. To collude
to commit an act of aggression based on unsubstantiated evidence.
The manslaughter, the torture, the secret prisons, the refusal to charge anyone for
the death of 31 prisoners, The kidnapping, the secret jails will come later.
You will face these charges and more as the truth comes to light after we the
silent mass have lobbied your honest constituents to remove you both and to
replace your wickedness with those who resigned Cook et al.
Then like Pinochet when out of office you will be arrested and charged as guilty.
"We must follow Logic," says Sands "you are guilty no matter when and where
International Law must prevail if Pinochet, why not you BLAIR AND BUSH AND STRAW"
Back to Top
|
Anti War
|
Click on the image below to see the latest figures for deaths in the Iraq War
Kill a Kid for England if your sick enough.
George Bush: Dumb and Dangerous.
Stop War, Stop the Politicians!
Fascism? Never Again. This website is Anti Fascist

|
|
|